Elder abuse in the COVID-19 era based on calls to the National Center on Elder Abuse resource line.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated circumstances that place older adults at higher risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Identifying characteristics of elder abuse during COVID-19 is critically important. This study characterized and compared elder abuse patterns across two time periods, a one-year period during the pandemic, and a corresponding one-year period prior to the start of the pandemic. METHODS: Contacts (including social media contacts, and email; all referred to as "calls" for expediency) made to the National Center on Elder Abuse (NCEA) resource line were examined for differences in types of reported elder abuse and characteristics of alleged perpetrators prior to the pandemic (Time 1; March 16, 2018 to March 15, 2019) and during the pandemic (Time 2; March 16, 2020 to March 15, 2021). Calls were examined for whether or not abuse was reported, the types of reported elder abuse, including financial, physical, sexual, emotional, and neglect, and characteristics of callers, victims, and alleged perpetrators. Chi-square tests of independence compared frequencies of elder abuse characteristics between time periods. RESULTS: In Time 1, 1401 calls were received, of which 795 calls (56.7%) described abuse. In Time 2, 1009 calls were received, of which 550 calls (54.5%) described abuse. The difference between time periods in frequency of abuse to non-abuse calls was not significant ([Formula: see text]). Time periods also did not significantly differ with regard to caller, victim, and perpetrator characteristics. Greater rates of physical abuse ([Formula: see text] and emotional abuse ([Formula: see text] were reported during Time 2 after adjustment for multiple comparisons. An increased frequency of multiple forms of abuse was also found in Time 2 compared to Time 1 ([Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest differences in specific elder abuse subtypes and frequency of co-occurrence between subtypes between time periods, pointing to a potential increase in the severity of elder abuse during COVID-19.

Feasibility and Considerations for Remote Interviewing of Persons Living With Dementia: Adaptations for COVID-19

The continuing COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated changes to research protocols and approaches to mitigate health risks to both study participants and researchers. This is particularly true of studies exploring the biopsychosocial well-being and personal perspectives of older adults and those at elevated risk of COVID-19 complications. While videoconferencing platforms have enabled remote work and social activities, reliance on them may potentially exclude some individuals (e.g., those without digital devices, access to high speed internet or proficiency with technology). Persons living with dementia (PLWD) may experience difficulties navigating videoconferencing systems and building rapport with interviewers, though the inclusion of PLWD in research is necessary to ensuring their equitable representation. This presentation disseminates promising practices and lessons learned from a longitudinal study conducting remote interviews on sensitive topics with PLWD and their care partners (CP). Findings are drawn from a case study of the Better Together Dementia Care Study, an 18-month longitudinal study of PLWD (N=8) and their CPs (N=13), which implemented remote interviewing in Summer 2020 to gather data on the quality-of-life, resilience, relationship quality, adverse childhood experiences, mistreatment, and health status of PLWD. Researchers were able to interview most enrolled PLWD (n=7) via videoconferencing. Paper surveys were mailed to phone-interviewed participants, enabling them to view questions and answer choices in concordance with verbal queries. Researchers also tested a protocol asking CPs to leave the room while PLWD answered questions on sensitive topics. Findings support the use of remote interviewing with PLWD and provide insights to guide replication of these approaches.

Exploring the Experiences of Persons Living With Dementia and Their Care Partners During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Public health measures implemented to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 have transformed the physical and social environments in which we live. The effects of these policies on persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners (CPs) are not fully understood. This study explores the experiences, attitudes, and perceptions of caregiving dyads during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cross-sectional survey data were drawn from a larger longitudinal study examining the relationship between PLWD aged 65+ and their CPs being conducted in a metropolitan city significantly affected by COVID-19. Interviews with were conducted remotely via videoconferencing and telephone. Data on sources and types of care provided for the PLWD, relationship quality and conflict, and caregiver stress were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and tests of independence. Preliminary results from PLWD (n=8) and CPs (n=13) confirmed a reduction in social interaction with family members and friends. CPs reported they (n=5) or other family members (n=2) changed their schedules to provide care for the PLWD. CPs reported increased conflict with the PLWD regarding care provision, going out or welcoming visitors, and home management. In contrast, PLWD reported a lack of conflict among household members (n=6) and the perception of good changes (n=2) and increased quality time with CPs. Preliminary findings provide empirical evidence of the effects of pandemic public health policies on dyads enrolled in this study and reveal differences in perceived relational conflict between PLWD and their CPs. Further research is needed to better understand the experiences of dyads and develop supportive interventions.